The three paths of an investigation are:

• A. Fact-finding, Appraisal, and Resolution
• B. Investigation, adjudication, remediation
• C. Inquiry, review, appeal
• D. Observation, documentation, enforcement

Answer: (A)

The main concept being tested is the structured flow of a recipient rights investigation. The three phases—fact-finding, appraisal, and resolution—outline how such investigations are typically carried out.

Fact-finding is about gathering information objectively. This means collecting all relevant facts, documents, and statements from involved parties without drawing conclusions. The goal is to establish a clear, verifiable picture of what happened, who was involved, when and where it occurred, and what was observed.

Appraisal follows the collection of facts. In this phase, those facts are evaluated for credibility, relevance, and impact. You weigh evidence, check consistency, and determine how the information aligns with applicable rights policies or standards. This step helps determine whether a violation occurred and what its significance is.

Resolution is the concluding phase. Based on the evaluated facts, you decide on appropriate actions to address the issue, communicate findings, implement corrective measures or protections, and close the case with a clear outcome. This phase ensures remedies are put in place and recurrence is prevented.

Other options describe different sequences or components that don’t reflect the standard investigative flow. For example, pairing investigation with adjudication and remediation introduces a formal decision stage and remediation as part of the flow but isn’t the typical three-phase progression. Inquiry, review, and appeal describe stages that may occur in a broader process, with an appeal generally following a decision rather than being part of the initial investigation. Observation, documentation, and enforcement resemble ongoing monitoring and enforcement rather than the specific three-step investigation process.